Stronger By Science Subscriber Q&A

Q&A: Greg Answers Your Questions About Volume

Episode Summary

In this Q&A Episode, Greg answers the questions you had about training volume, following up on our article on the topic.

Episode Notes

In this Q&A Episode, Greg answers the questions you had about training volume, following up on our article on the topic.

You can find the article here: https://www.strongerbyscience.com/volume/

And here’s the Pelland meta-regression that’s referenced throughout: https://sportrxiv.org/index.php/server/preprint/view/460/967

 

TIME STAMPS

00:03:34 - How could you practically train most muscle groups with high volumes?

00:07:20 - Is it better to do more sets, even if that would require shorter rest intervals?

00:11:09 - Is it better to prioritize volume or lengthened-biased training?

00:17:57 - Do volume requirements vary for different muscles?

00:23:40 - How should you account for drop sets and rest-paused sets when calculating volume?

00:26:39 - How many reps per set should you aim for when training with higher volumes?

00:33:26 - How do you think about the limitations of the volume literature?

00:40:27 - Are volume requirements impacted by being in an energy deficit?

00:44:13 - How should you count your training volume?

00:57:52 - Is it bad to train again before you’re fully recovered?

01:06:25 - How are people able to recover when training with high volumes?

01:14:23 - Why doesn’t frequency seem to play as large of a role as one might expect?
 

SOURCES

Equating volume with shorter rest intervals:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35622106/
 

You probably don’t need to maximize ROM to benefit from “long muscle length” training:

See the section of this article with the header “Is it Always Preferable to Train at Longer Muscle Lengths?”: https://www.strongerbyscience.com/rom/. And this is the more recent study on the leg press: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40113586/

 

Type II fibers are generally more susceptible to muscle damage:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8549894/

 

Drop sets and rest-pause sets:

Recent drop-set meta-analysis: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10390395/. There’s less research on rest-pause sets, but see the effect estimates for Enes and Prestes here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11022786/

 

Single study about training volume in a deficit discussed here:

https://www.strongerbyscience.com/research-spotlight-volume-muscle-dieting/

 

You probably don’t need to fully recover before training again:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29967584/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27682004/

https://journals.lww.com/nsca-scj/Citation/1985/02000/Research__Changes_in_body_composition,_body_build.4.aspx

Also, the Bjørnsen study discussed in the volume article is relevant: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30543499/ (All of the training was in the form of two 5-day blocks of training with 7 training sessions per block. Each session was 4 sets of low-load BFR knee extensions to failure. Subjects still made really solid gains, despite only being “recovered” for exactly two workouts)

 

Faster recovery rates with repeated exposures to the same stressor:

The section of the article about swelling also applies to general neuromuscular recovery: https://www.strongerbyscience.com/volume/#h-the-case-against-swelling

 

Grgic frequency meta:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29470825/